All in Volume V - 2019
In this Dissertation, Christos Georgiou considers the benefits and complexities of International Commercial Arbitration, questioning whether the ‘seat’ theory still takes precedence over the ‘delocalisation’ theory in arbitral disputes.
THIS IS AN ESSAY BY NAZ KHAN WHICH WON THE 2019 LECHMERE PRIZE, DISCUSSING WHETHER THE LEGAL UNCERTAINTY CAUSED BY TRIGGERING ARTICLE 50 JUSTIFIES UNDERMINING PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY IN FAVOUR OF A CODIFIED CONSTITUTION.
This dissertation by Lily Church analyses the past and present housing legislation through a methodological socio-legal approach, focusing specifically on the Grenfell Tower tragedy.
This dissertation is by Raphael Chinwuko discussing the interpretation and application of Article 14 ECHR in the protection of sexual minorities from discrimination.
This is a dissertation by Katrina Muscat which investigates how the Companies Act 2006 fails to bring about corporate action in the face of climate change.
This dissertation by Joel Platt analyses the operation of the UK’s ‘Prevent’ strategy within Universities and its implications for freedom of expression and democracy.
This dissertation by Alina Liew considers the discretionary approach English law takes to the division of assets upon divorce and whether this leaves the ‘everyday’ homemaker under-protected in cases of marriage termination.
This is a dissertation by Eadaoin Macrandal analysing the law of consent concerning medical treatment for children and advocating for a retreat from the paternalistic approach of the law toward consent post-Gillick.
In this dissertation, Tanvi Pahwa discusses whether the propertization of personal data represents a viable solution to the topical issue of data protection.
This is a dissertation by Mia Purdy which examines the societal framework surrounding revenge porn and upskirting, arguing that English legislation provides ineffective protection against such crimes.
This is a dissertation by Ryan Robinson Perinchief exploring ‘democratic equality theory and the disproportionate impact of cannabis law & policy on black and minority ethnic groups.’
